• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Secure Payments
Phone: 250-753-2202
Nanaimo Law | Heath Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Termination of Employees Without Cause – Wrongful Dismissal

Blog

The relationship between an employer and employee is contractual. As such, there is no general principle that an employer has to employ any particular person. Employment contracts, whether written or unwritten, can therefore be terminated provided certain requirements are met. To terminate an employee, an employer must give an employee notice that they are being let go or pay the employee compensation in lieu of giving notice.

Section 63 of the Employment Standards Act provides a severance formula for employees whose employment has been terminated. However, employees are frequently entitled to more than the amount stipulated in the Act.

In Machtinger v. HOJ Industries Ltd., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986 (S.C.C.) at paragraph 19, the Supreme Court of Canada stated “employment contracts for an indefinite period of time require the employer, absent express contractual language to the contrary, to give reasonable notice of an intention to terminate the contract if the dismissal is without cause.”

The Court then wrote at paragraph 22 that “what constitutes reasonable notice will vary in the circumstances of any particular case.” While calculating the exact amount of compensation varies from case to case, employees are frequently entitled to one month’s notice of termination or pay in lieu for each year they were employed with a company. In other words, if an employee worked at a company for 10 years and is dismissed without cause, the employee may be entitled to 10 months of notice or compensation in lieu of notice.

In van’t Slot v. Oncogenex Technologies Inc., 2010 BCPC 249 at paragraph 14, the court wrote that the Employment Standards Act sets out the “minimum notice” to which an employee is entitled upon being let go from a job. In van’t Slot, the court found that an employment contract can be drafted to expressly provide that an employee’s severance will correspond with the amounts in the Employment Standards Act.

The result of Machtinger and van’t Slot is that employers and employees can contract a specific time period for notice of termination or compensation in lieu. However, any provision setting out the notice or compensation period must line up with the termination sections of the Employment Standards Act, at a minimum. Employers and employees may wish to create certainty in the terms of employment by drafting a clause in the employment contract which provides that if an employee is dismissed without cause, the employee’s severance will mirror the termination sections of the Employment Standards Act. Without such a clause, an employee may be eligible for significantly more compensation than what is provided by the Act.

If you need legal advice on this subject or any other law related inquiry please contact us.

September 14, 2016/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2016-09-14 00:17:172017-09-19 17:48:15Termination of Employees Without Cause – Wrongful Dismissal

What are you buying when you commission an original painting? Sale of Goods Act

Blog

In the recent British Columbia case of Brennan v. Burrow, 2016 BCPC 78, the purchasers of an original painting from an artist sued to recover the $9,000.00 purchase price.

The purchasers commissioned a painting for their West Kelowna home after viewing the artist’s work at the Calgary Stampede.  The purchasers noticed a problem immediately upon delivery of the painting – that there was a distorting glare due to the finish of the painting. They said that this glare makes it difficult to focus on the painting.  The artist denied the glare problem and stated that the painting had the same finish as the other paintings viewed by the purchasers.

In Court, the purchasers alleged there was an implied term in the contract – on the basis of s. 18 of the B.C. Sale of Goods Act – that the painting would be reasonably fit to hang in their living room.

The Court had to decide whether the contract for the painting is for the work and labour of the artist (separate from the actual painting) or whether it is for the original painting itself? The Court held that in British Columbia contracts for original paintings are for the work and labour of the painter. In other words the contract is not for the actual painting, it is for the time the artist spends on the production of the painting. Since s. 18 of the B.C. Sale of Goods Act only applies to goods, the Court held that there is no implied term in the contract regarding the painting being reasonably fit for the living room and dismissed the purchaser’s claim.

If you need legal advice on this subject or any other law related inquiry please contact us.

September 13, 2016/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2016-09-13 00:14:562017-09-19 17:48:42What are you buying when you commission an original painting? Sale of Goods Act
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Adoption
  • Blog
  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Child Support
  • Divorce Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Gifts
  • Homeowner Liability
  • Litigation
  • Medical Assistance in Dying
  • Parenting
  • Pedestrians
  • Personal Injury
  • Power of Attorney
  • Property
  • Real Estate
  • Small Claims Court
  • Spousal Support
  • Trusts And Estates Law
  • Wills

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • April 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016

Nanaimo Personal Injury Lawyers & Family Law

Accidents Adoption Blog Business and Commercial Law Child Support Divorce Law Employment Law Family Law Gifts Homeowner Liability Litigation Medical Assistance in Dying Parenting Pedestrians Personal Injury Power of Attorney Property Real Estate Small Claims Court Spousal Support Trusts And Estates Law Wills

Heath Law LLP

Heath Law LLP is a full service law firm that opened in Nanaimo on Vancouver Island in 1950. We are proud of our heritage. Six of our lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, four as Judges, one as an Associate Judge and one as a Judicial Justice. Heath Law LLP boasts high calibre and experienced legal counsel.

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact Info

Address: 200-1808 Bowen Road Nanaimo, British Columbia
V9S 5W4

Phone: 250-753-2202
Toll Free: 1-866-753-2202
Fax: 250-753-3949
Email: consult@nanaimolaw.com

© Copyright Nanaimo Law | Heath Law. - All Rights Reserved | Website by Webacom
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top