• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Secure Payments
Phone: 250-753-2202
Nanaimo Law | Heath Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Court clarifies child support calculations for disabled adult children – Child Support

Blog

Sindaco v. Sindaco, 2016 BCSC 389

This case involved the determination of the appropriate amount of child support for an adult who remained a child of the marriage due to psychological disability. The adult child was estranged from his father, who was the payor, and lived with his mother, who was the recipient.

The father earned approximately $53,000 per year, and the mother $10,890. Their proportionate split of their incomes were 83% and 17% respectively. If the Federal Child Support Table were applied the father would pay table child support of $488 per month.

The adult child received $906 per month in disability benefits.

Justice Steeves applied the approach from Kohlmuss v. Kohlmuss, 2015 BCSC 1101 in determining appropriate child support, which requires the

-calculation of reasonable costs of the child;

-deduction of the amount of the disability benefit; and

-division between the parents proportionate to income of any shortfall.

One topic of discussion was to what extent the adult child should be afforded discretionary spending money. Justice Steeves determined that inclusion of some spending money was an appropriate expense, despite the child’s history of using such money wastefully, or in some case for purposes harmful to himself.

Ultimately, Justice Steeves found that the current situation where the child was allowed to spend much of his disability benefit as discretionary funds was not appropriate; however, determined that an amount of $50 per week for discretionary spending was appropriate.

The child’s expenses were calculate as $1,140 per month leaving a shortfall of $234 after the disability benefit was applied. The father’s proportionate share based on income was therefore $194.

June 23, 2016/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Reddit
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2016-06-23 18:20:212023-04-17 14:22:36Court clarifies child support calculations for disabled adult children – Child Support
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Adoption
  • Blog
  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Child Support
  • Divorce Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Gifts
  • Homeowner Liability
  • Litigation
  • Medical Assistance in Dying
  • Parenting
  • Pedestrians
  • Personal Injury
  • Power of Attorney
  • Property
  • Real Estate
  • Small Claims Court
  • Spousal Support
  • Trusts And Estates Law
  • Wills

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • April 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016

Nanaimo Personal Injury Lawyers & Family Law

Accidents Adoption Blog Business and Commercial Law Child Support Divorce Law Employment Law Family Law Gifts Homeowner Liability Litigation Medical Assistance in Dying Parenting Pedestrians Personal Injury Power of Attorney Property Real Estate Small Claims Court Spousal Support Trusts And Estates Law Wills

Heath Law LLP

Heath Law LLP is a full service law firm that opened in Nanaimo on Vancouver Island in 1950. We are proud of our heritage. Six of our lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, four as Judges, one as an Associate Judge and one as a Judicial Justice. Heath Law LLP boasts high calibre and experienced legal counsel.

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact Info

Address: 200-1808 Bowen Road Nanaimo, British Columbia
V9S 5W4

Phone: 250-753-2202
Toll Free: 1-866-753-2202
Fax: 250-753-3949
Email: consult@nanaimolaw.com

© Copyright Nanaimo Law | Heath Law. - All Rights Reserved | Website by Webacom
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Link to: Tenant’s grow-ops and knowledge: when will your insurance be invalid? Insurance Law Link to: Tenant’s grow-ops and knowledge: when will your insurance be invalid? Insurance Law Tenant’s grow-ops and knowledge: when will your insurance be invalid?... Link to: Parenting time right of first refusal; court find disruptive to children when parent only away for short time – Family Law Link to: Parenting time right of first refusal; court find disruptive to children when parent only away for short time – Family Law Parenting time right of first refusal; court find disruptive to children when...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top