• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Secure Payments
Phone: 250-753-2202
Nanaimo Law | Heath Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Limitations Act of British Columbia – Mortgage Debts

Blog, Real Estate

BC Limitations Act

In 2013 the new BC Limitation Act (“BCLA”) came into force.  There are many differences between the BCLA and the old BC Limitation Act.  Two of these differences are in relation to s. 14 and s. 15 of the BCLA.

S.14 of the BCLA relates to the limitation period for demand obligations. S. 14 states: “A claim for a demand obligation is discovered on the first day that there is a failure to perform the obligation after a demand for the performance has been made.” In other words, the countdown period for the limitation period does not start until the borrower under an agreement fails to pay an obligation once a demand has been made.  The old BC limitation act had a six year limitation period for demand obligations in which the countdown period for the limitation period would start from the date the initial obligation arose.

S.15 of the BCLA relates to the limitation period for realizing or redeeming security.  S. 15 states: “A claim to realize or redeem security is discovered on the first day that the right to enforce the security arises.”  This is a marked difference from the old BC Limitation Act which had a six year limitation period for bringing action on collateral that was not in the secured party’s possession.  Lenders in secured transactions need to be aware of this striking change.

These two provisions of the BCLA were judicially scrutinized for the first time since their enactment in the recent British Columbia Court of Appeal decision Leatherman v 0969708 BC Ltd., 2018 BCCA 33.  This case is illustrative of the wariness lenders should have in regards to the new BCLA.

In Leatherman a mortgage was granted to secure a debt.  Under the mortgage the loan was payable on demand, with payments of interest to be paid annually.  The Mortgagor failed to make a required interest payment on Oct 31, 2013.  This is effectively the date of default.  No further action was taken by the mortgagees until Nov, 2015.  At that time correspondence was exchanged between the parties in relation to the debt and its repayment.  A demand was made by the mortgagees on Nov 9, 2016.

The Court stated “This Mortgage, like most mortgages, includes both a covenant to pay and security for the debt. The covenant to pay the principal, considered on its face, and alone, is a demand obligation. With respect to it, s. 14 applies; that is, it is not payable until demand. The obligation to pay interest, however, is not a demand obligation because it was payable without demand on October 31 of each year. The Mortgage also provides that the property mortgaged is security for the debt. With respect to security for the debt, s. 15 of the Act applies. The right to realize on the security arises upon discovery of that right.”  In other words, the mortgage became enforceable as of the date of default, Oct 31, 2013, and would be statute barred two years later.  However, the mortgagor was still liable for his personal covenant as two years has not elapsed since demand for payment was made.

Going forward, where there is a default on a mortgage a lender must foreclose within two years of that default even if the loan, which is supported by the mortgage, is payable on demand, and no demand has been made.

The limitation period could be extended beyond two years after default where a mortgagor acknowledges liability.  This is governed by s.24 of the BCLA.  S. 24(1)(a) states “If, before the expiry of either of the limitation periods that, under this Act, apply to a claim, a person acknowledges liability in respect of the claim, the claim must not be considered to have been discovered on any day earlier than the day on which the acknowledgement is made.”

Acknowledgement under s .24 includes a debtor’s performance of an obligation under or in respect of a security agreement (s. 24(8)).  In other words, for a conventional mortgage where there are specified payments, when the mortgagor under a mortgage makes a payment after their initial default this will postpone the date of discovery to the date on which the mortgagor made the after default payment.

June 11, 2018/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Reddit
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2018-06-11 14:55:262025-09-08 20:33:36Limitations Act of British Columbia – Mortgage Debts
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Adoption
  • Blog
  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Child Support
  • Divorce Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Gifts
  • Homeowner Liability
  • Litigation
  • Medical Assistance in Dying
  • Parenting
  • Pedestrians
  • Personal Injury
  • Power of Attorney
  • Property
  • Real Estate
  • Small Claims Court
  • Spousal Support
  • Trusts And Estates Law
  • Wills

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • April 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016

Nanaimo Personal Injury Lawyers & Family Law

Accidents Adoption Blog Business and Commercial Law Child Support Divorce Law Employment Law Family Law Gifts Homeowner Liability Litigation Medical Assistance in Dying Parenting Pedestrians Personal Injury Power of Attorney Property Real Estate Small Claims Court Spousal Support Trusts And Estates Law Wills

Heath Law LLP

Heath Law LLP is a full service law firm that opened in Nanaimo on Vancouver Island in 1950. We are proud of our heritage. Six of our lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, four as Judges, one as an Associate Judge and one as a Judicial Justice. Heath Law LLP boasts high calibre and experienced legal counsel.

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact Info

Address: 200-1808 Bowen Road Nanaimo, British Columbia
V9S 5W4

Phone: 250-753-2202
Toll Free: 1-866-753-2202
Fax: 250-753-3949
Email: consult@nanaimolaw.com

© Copyright Nanaimo Law | Heath Law. - All Rights Reserved | Website by Webacom
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Link to: Dying without a Will Link to: Dying without a Will Dying without a Will Link to: Consequences of Faulty Estate Planning Link to: Consequences of Faulty Estate Planning Consequences of Faulty Estate Planning
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top