• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Secure Payments
Phone: 250-753-2202
Nanaimo Law | Heath Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?

Blog, Family Law, Gifts, Parenting, Real Estate, Trusts And Estates Law

In today’s housing market, it is increasingly common for parents to help their children financially when buying a home. Although the parent’s intention—whether the funds are meant as a gift or a loan—may be clear at the outset, circumstances such as death or changing family relationships can create uncertainty over time. This is why proper documentation is essential. Clear records protect all involved and preserve family relationships by preventing misunderstandings down the road.

Understanding the Legal Presumption

When a parent transfers money to an adult child without receiving anything in return, the law generally presumes that the transfer is not a gift but is instead held on trust by the child for the parent.

This is because the law presumes bargains, not gifts to adult independent children. In other words, while the child may have legal ownership of the money, the parent is considered the beneficial owner.

This is called the presumption of resulting trust. It applies unless evidence shows that the transfer was intended as a gift.

The presumption can lead to complications if a dispute arises later, particularly when there is no clear record of what the transferring parent intended (gift versus loan) at the time of the transfer.

Making Your Intentions Clear

To avoid confusion and potential disputes, it is critical to establish, from the outset, whether the money is intended as a gift or a loan. If the parent intends the funds to be a loan, certain steps should be taken to document this clearly:

  1. Create a Written Loan Agreement: Courts focus on the intention of the parent at the time of the transfer. A written document illustrating the parent’s intention, prepared contemporaneously with the transfer of funds, provides the strongest evidence of this intent.
  2. Specify Repayment Terms: The loan agreement should outline the terms of repayment, including any interest, schedule of payments, and consequences of default. Even a simple repayment plan reduces ambiguity as it demonstrates the expectation of repayment.
  3. Keep Documentation Accessible: Retain copies of the loan agreement, bank transfers, and any correspondence discussing the loan. This documentation can be invaluable if disagreements arise later.

If the funds are intended as a gift, it is equally important to document that intent. A simple Deed of Gift, gift letter or other written declaration can help to evidence the intention of the parent to give the money with no expectation of repayment. This protects both parties and can be used to rebut the legal presumption of resulting trust.

Common Pitfalls

Problems most often occur when nothing is documented at the time of transfer of funds. What begins as a clear oral agreement can become muddled over the years, especially as family dynamics shift – for example, if the child separates from a partner, if siblings become involved, if the parent’s financial situation changes or if someone dies.

Without clear evidence, one party may later claim that the funds were a gift, while the other insists they were a loan. This can lead to costly legal battles and lasting strain on family relationships.

Final Thoughts

Providing financial assistance to family members can be a generous and helpful gesture, but it comes with potential legal and relational complexities. By clearly documenting gifts or loans (specifying repayment terms), and keeping thorough records, parents can protect their interests and maintain harmony within the family. Clear communication and proper documentation ensure that everyone understands the nature of the transaction, preventing misunderstandings down the road.

If you are considering providing financial help to a child or another family member, it’s important to make sure your intentions are clearly documented. The lawyers at Heath Law LLP in Nanaimo can guide you through preparing a loan agreement or gift documentation to protect both your interests and your family relationships. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.

September 9, 2025/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2025-09-09 13:51:492025-09-09 13:51:49Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?

Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Blog, Property, Real Estate

In real estate transactions, parties rely on the information provided by one another to form a clear understanding of the deal.

Mutual trust and honest communication are essential for meaningful engagement among all involved. The act of misrepresentation, whether through a false statement or the omission of a material fact, undermines that trust. Misrepresentation can significantly influence a party’s decision and expose the other to serious legal consequences.

A recent decision, Sewell v. Abadian, a 2025 British Columbia Court of Appeal ruling, illustrates how courts in BC address the issue of misrepresentation by omission.

In Sewell, the seller, a former realtor, failed to disclose in the disclosure statement that an addition to the home did not have a permit, even though it was known to him. He crossed out relevant sections of the disclosure statement stating only that he had not lived in the home himself. The Court concluded that the buyer had reasonably relied on the seller to disclose everything he knew about the property. By crossing out parts of the disclosure statement, the buyer believed the seller was indicating he was unaware of the answers to those questions.

The seller’s omission was found to constitute misrepresentation, entitling the buyer to rescind the deal and recover a $300,000 deposit. The Sewell decision reinforces the legal and ethical responsibility of full disclosure in real estate transactions. It makes clear that silence or selective omission can amount to misrepresentation with serious consequences, and that courts will scrutinize attempts to obscure or withhold material information.

For anyone involved in real estate, this case underscores the importance of transparency and the potential risks of failing to disclose known issues.

September 3, 2025/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2025-09-03 23:24:512025-09-03 23:24:51Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Real Estate: Misrepresentation by Phantom Bidding

Blog, Property, Real Estate

In real estate transactions, buyers rely on information provided by the sellers and their realtors to make informed decisions.

Practices like phantom bidding, where false or non-existent offers are alluded to in order to create a sense of competition, undermine that trust. This deceptive tactic misrepresents the actual interest in a property, manipulating buyers into making higher offers based on misleading information. Such behavior erodes the integrity of the transaction and can damage the credibility of those involved. Tran v. Brickman, a recent 2025 Ontario Superior Court decision illustrates how courts in Canada address issues of misrepresentation.

The seller in Tran fabricated offers, falsely communicating to the only buyer that there were other offers in play. To complete the deal, the buyer would have to increase their offer. The court found that these offers, allegedly made by other parties, were nothing more than “oral puffery.” They were not valid under Ontario’s real estate regulations, which require offers to be in writing.

As a result, these were found to be phantom bids.

The buyer was awarded $28,600 in damages under the loss of opportunity doctrine, recognizing the buyer’s lost chance to negotiate fairly. The ruling reinforced that offers must comply with real estate regulations or they could be seen as phantom bids in Ontario, leading to misrepresentation.

Ontario has taken steps to regulate phantom bidding, including rule changes in 2015 and increased enforcement. British Columbia has seen fewer formal complaints and has therefore not adopted similar regulations, instead continuing to rely upon existing ethical standards. The case law in British Columbia on phantom bidding is limited, however, there are signs of growing attention to the issue. In July 2023, real estate boards across British Columbia’s lower mainland introduced the Disclosure of Multiple Offers Presented form.

This form requires listing agents to disclose the number of offers and brokerages involved, enhancing transparency and aiming to boost buyer confidence in competitive offer situations. Transparency does remain limited, as actual offer details remain hidden.

While not a direct response to phantom bidding, it is a clear step toward increased accountability in offer presentation.

 

September 3, 2025/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2025-09-03 23:13:082025-09-03 23:16:00Real Estate: Misrepresentation by Phantom Bidding
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Adoption
  • Blog
  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Child Support
  • Divorce Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Gifts
  • Homeowner Liability
  • Litigation
  • Medical Assistance in Dying
  • Parenting
  • Pedestrians
  • Personal Injury
  • Power of Attorney
  • Property
  • Real Estate
  • Small Claims Court
  • Spousal Support
  • Trusts And Estates Law
  • Wills

Archives

  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • April 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016

Nanaimo Personal Injury Lawyers & Family Law

Accidents Adoption Blog Business and Commercial Law Child Support Divorce Law Employment Law Family Law Gifts Homeowner Liability Litigation Medical Assistance in Dying Parenting Pedestrians Personal Injury Power of Attorney Property Real Estate Small Claims Court Spousal Support Trusts And Estates Law Wills

Heath Law LLP

Heath Law LLP is a full service law firm that opened in Nanaimo on Vancouver Island in 1950. We are proud of our heritage. Six of our lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, four as Judges, one as an Associate Judge and one as a Judicial Justice. Heath Law LLP boasts high calibre and experienced legal counsel.

Recent Posts

  • Does a Named Beneficiary Automatically Inherit your TFSA, RRSP, RRIF or FHSA? Not Always in BC
  • Did a Text Message Change a Will?
  • Buying a Strata? Essential Strata Documents To Review
  • Why Should a Parent Document a Loan to a Family Member?
  • Real Estate in BC: Misrepresentation in Property Disclosure

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact Info

Address: 200-1808 Bowen Road Nanaimo, British Columbia
V9S 5W4

Phone: 250-753-2202
Toll Free: 1-866-753-2202
Fax: 250-753-3949
Email: consult@nanaimolaw.com

© Copyright Nanaimo Law | Heath Law. - All Rights Reserved | Website by Webacom
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top