• Link to Facebook
  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Secure Payments
Phone: 250-753-2202
Nanaimo Law | Heath Law
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Mission
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Make a Payment
  • Employment Opportunities
  • Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Is This Defamation? Understanding Defamation Law In BC

Blog, Litigation

Defamation Law in BC: Libel, Slander & Online Reviews

Have you or your business suffered a loss as a result of someone else’s words? Conversely, is someone alleging that you have caused them harm because you shared a review online? It can be hard to tell whether a person has a legitimate claim for defamation under the law. This article provides basic information about defamation law in BC.

The basic elements of defamation in BC

There are three things which must be proved for a defamation claim to be successful. As set out in the case of Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, (1) there must be a defamatory statement, (2) the statement must refer to the plaintiff, (3) the statement must be communicated to a third party. Once these three things have been proved the person being accused of defamation must put forward a defence to escape liability. If it has been proved that a defamatory statement referring to the plaintiff was made to a third party, it is presumed that the statement was meant to cause harm to the reputation of the plaintiff.

Libel vs. slander 

Libel and slander both fall under defamation. The difference between libel and slander is the method by which the statement is communicated to third parties. Libel is typically recorded in some form and shared. Under BC’s Libel and Slander Act, RSBC 1996, c 263 defamatory words in a broadcast are deemed to be published and to constitute libel. Social media posts also fall under libel. Slander is shared with third parties in passing, typically through verbal statements. It is easier to prove damages for libel than for slander. This is because slander generally requires proof that a loss has resulted from the defamatory statement, whereas when libel is made out there is a presumption that the statement was meant to cause harm.

Key defences

There are a number of defences against a defamation claim. If the defendant can prove that the allegedly defamatory statement is true, this is the defence of truth or justification. There is also the fair comment defence, which can be found under s.6.1 of the Libel and Slander Act. The fair comment defence protects people expressing an opinion. The defence of qualified privilege applies where a person has a duty to communicate the allegedly defamatory statement to a third party. Finally, responsible communication on matters of public interest is a defence for making allegedly defamatory statements as well.

Online reviews and social media specifically 

The question then becomes whether a successful defamation claim can be brought against a person for posting reviews online and, specifically, on social media. There is tension between genuine consumer complaints and opinions, and defamatory claims. Courts are cautious about preventing legitimate criticism. Online reviews and posts to social media are often protected under the defence of fair comment (as described above). That being said, in the case of Level One Construction Ltd. v Burnham, 2018 BCSC 1354 it was explained that the fair comment defence can be defeated, if it is shown that the person who made the statement acted maliciously.

BC’s anti-SLAPP law 

The Protection of Public Participation Act allows for quicker dismissal of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (“SLAPP”). It lets defendants get early dismissal of lawsuits that target public-interest expression, which affects strategy on both sides. If an application to dismiss the proceedings is made under this legislation, it must be shown that the proceeding arises from an expression made by the person making the application and that the expression relates to a matter of public interest. If this first step is proved, the onus is then on the other side to prove that there are grounds to believe that the proceeding has merit. They must also prove that the applicant has no valid defence in the proceeding and that the likely harm to the respondent is serious enough that the public interest in continuing the proceeding outweighs the public interest in protecting that expression.

September 18, 2026/by Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers
Tags: BC Defamation Laws, Libel vs Slander, SLAPP laws
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Reddit
/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png 0 0 Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers /wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath-Law-Logo-300x75.png Heath Law, Nanaimo Lawyers2026-09-18 15:06:542026-09-18 15:06:54Is This Defamation? Understanding Defamation Law In BC
Search Search

Recent Posts

  • Is This Defamation? Understanding Defamation Law In BC
  • How Does The Principal Residence Exemption Affect Spouses
  • Do I Actually Need A Lawyer For Small Claims In BC?
  • “Can My Landlord Do That?”
  • Can I Get Out of a Contract in BC?

Categories

  • Accidents
  • Adoption
  • Blog
  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Child Support
  • Divorce Law
  • Employment Law
  • Family Law
  • Gifts
  • Homeowner Liability
  • Litigation
  • Medical Assistance in Dying
  • Parenting
  • Pedestrians
  • Personal Injury
  • Power of Attorney
  • Property
  • Real Estate
  • Small Claims Court
  • Spousal Support
  • Trusts And Estates Law
  • Wills

Archives

  • September 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • September 2025
  • July 2025
  • April 2025
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • May 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2016

Nanaimo Personal Injury Lawyers & Family Law

Accidents Adoption Blog Business and Commercial Law Child Support Divorce Law Employment Law Family Law Gifts Homeowner Liability Litigation Medical Assistance in Dying Parenting Pedestrians Personal Injury Power of Attorney Property Real Estate Small Claims Court Spousal Support Trusts And Estates Law Wills

Heath Law LLP

Heath Law LLP is a full service law firm that opened in Nanaimo on Vancouver Island in 1950. We are proud of our heritage. Six of our lawyers have been appointed to the Supreme Court of British Columbia, four as Judges, one as an Associate Judge and one as a Judicial Justice. Heath Law LLP boasts high calibre and experienced legal counsel.

Recent Posts

  • Is This Defamation? Understanding Defamation Law In BC
  • How Does The Principal Residence Exemption Affect Spouses
  • Do I Actually Need A Lawyer For Small Claims In BC?
  • “Can My Landlord Do That?”
  • Can I Get Out of a Contract in BC?

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contact Info

Address: 200-1808 Bowen Road Nanaimo, British Columbia
V9S 5W4

Phone: 250-753-2202
Toll Free: 1-866-753-2202
Fax: 250-753-3949
Email: consult@nanaimolaw.com

© Copyright Nanaimo Law | Heath Law. - All Rights Reserved | Website by Webacom
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Link to: How Does The Principal Residence Exemption Affect Spouses Link to: How Does The Principal Residence Exemption Affect Spouses How Does The Principal Residence Exemption Affect Spouses
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top